Chagas Disease and Heart Failure: An Expanding Issue Worldwide

Login or register to view PDF.

Chagas disease, originally a South American endemic health problem, is expanding worldwide because of people migration. Its main impact is on the cardiovascular system, producing myocardial damage that frequently results in heart failure. Pathogenic pathways are mainly related to inmunoinflamatory reactions in the myocardium and, less frequently, in the gastrointestinal tract. The heart usually shows fibrosis, producing dilatation and damage of the electrogenic cardiac system. These changes result in cardiomyopathy with heart failure and frequent cardiac arrhythmias and heart blocks. Diagnosis of the disease must include a lab test to detect the parasite or its immune reactions and the usual techniques to evaluate cardiac function. Therapeutic management of Chagas heart failure does not differ significantly from the most common treatment for dilated cardiomyopathy, with special focus on arrhythmias and several degrees of heart block. Heart transplantation is reserved for end-stage cases. Major international scientific organisations are delivering recommendations for prevention and early diagnosis. This article provides an analysis of epidemiology, prevention, treatment and the relationship between Chagas disease and heart failure.

FM, EP and ASL have no conflicts of interest to declare. SVP is a member of advisory groups for Novartis, Ferrer, Abbott and Servier, and has received conference fees from these companies.
Felipe Martinez, Cordoba National University, Av Colón 2057, Cordoba X5003DCE, Argentina. E:
Received date
10 December 2018
Accepted date
01 April 2019
European Cardiology Review 2019;14(2):ePub: 21 May 2019.
Open access
This work is open access under the CC-BY-NC 4.0 License which allows users to copy, redistribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work is cited correctly.

Chagas disease was initially described as an endemic health problem in a few countries in South America – mainly Argentina and Brazil – and one of the consequences of the disease, heart damage, made it an interesting issue for healthcare professionals, from epidemiologists to cardiologists.1 Chagas cardiomyopathy (ChCM) is now recognised as a cardiovascular disorder, diagnosed and treated not only in the original region, but also in Europe, North America and even in Asia (Figure 1). This is a result of increased migration around the world.2–4 It is estimated that Chagas disease affects 6–7 million people in Latin America and more than 300,000 people in the US.5,6 The natural history of the disease shows that after two to three decades up to 30% of infected individuals exhibit evidence of chronic cardiomyopathy and a proportion of these develop heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).7 Despite the high prevalence of Chagas disease, little is known about morbidity and mortality in patients with HFrEF caused by Chagas disease, compared with other aetiologies, especially in the modern era of HF therapies.8,9 Future trials should consider recruiting larger numbers of patients with ChCM to allow adequately powered subgroup analysis. We still treat patients with HF caused by ChCM empirically with therapies recommended by guidelines and this is another reason to specifically promote more research in ChCM.10 This article will analyse and discuss Chagas disease and HF, from epidemiology through to the latest treatment and prevention strategies.

The Expanding Epidemiology

Chagas disease is an important public health problem, with a frequency 140 times higher than HIV. Initiatives in the Americas have helped to achieve significant reductions in the number of acute cases of Chagas disease and the presence of domiciliary triatomine vectors in endemic areas. The estimated number of people infected with Trypanosoma cruzi worldwide dropped from 30 million in 1990 to 8–10 million in 2010, the annual incidence of infection decreased from 700,000 to 28,000 new cases over the same period and the burden of disease decreased from 2.8 million disability-adjusted life-years lost to <0.5 million years between 1990 and 2006.11 Approximately 108 million people are exposed to Chagas disease in 21 South American countries, with 8 million infected and 41,200 new cases per year. About 20–40% of infected people will develop cardiac damage.12–14 The prevalence of Chagas disease varies between countries, from 1.3% in Brazil to 20.0% in Bolivia. In the US, estimates claim that over 0.5 million immigrants are infected with T cruzi. The number of houses infested by triatomine vectors has been reduced as a result of campaigns and the work of teams throughout South America. Vectorial transmission has been stopped in Uruguay, Chile and Brazil, and in large areas of Argentina and Venezuela, achieving an average reduction in prevalence and incidence of 70%.

Worldwide Expansion of Chagas Disease

Open in new tab

Chagas disease is an important cause of dilated cardiomyopathy in Latin America, where the disease is endemic.15,16 Chagas heart disease (ChHD) commonly presents with symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias, symptomatic bradyarrhythmias, sudden death, HF, embolic events, chest pain and high susceptibility to proarrhythmia.15 The clinical picture mimics that of coronary artery disease and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. The prognosis is poor for patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmias, HF, left ventricular aneurysm or global systolic dysfunction.16 Moreover, in an Argentinian survey, HF was the most frequent finding, leading clinicians to suspect Chagas disease.17

HF may occur in approximately 10% of subjects who have Chagas disease with cardiac involvement.18,19 A meta-analysis of 143 studies of HF from Latin America reported the incidence of HF in Chagas disease to be 137 per 100,000 people per year and annual mortality to be 1.12–7.18 per 100,000 people per year. Higher in-hospital mortality was also found in patients with Chagas disease, compared with a non-Chagas disease aetiology, representing 36% of the aetiology of HF.20 The estimated prevalence of Chagas disease within HF populations in Argentina is about 15%.21 However, data from different surveys reveal a Chagas disease prevalence of 4.0–6.0% in outpatient registries and 1.3–8.4% in decompensated HF settings in Argentina, and of 0.6–20.0% in Latin American registries.22–24 This discrepancy may be attributable to actual lower prevalence, underrepresentation of rural inhabitants in the surveys, low use of screening tests or because some cases of Chagas disease might represent a comorbidity. The Grupo de Estudio de la Sobrevida en la Insuficiencia Cardíaca en Argentina (GESICA) Registry has shown a prevalence of true ChCM of 6.4%.25 Patients with Chagas disease had a different clinical profile from, and were treated differently to, those without Chagas disease. Patients with ChCM were admitted more frequently for decompensated HF than other patients.26 It has been reported that long-term outcomes in patients with chronic systolic HF secondary to ChCM are poorer than those in patients with idiopathic and ischaemic aetiologies.27,28

Acute decompensated HF (ADHF) is a common clinical condition in ChCM. A study has shown that patients with ChCM had the highest proportion of hospital admissions for cardiogenic shock and arrhythmia, with lower systolic blood pressure and a higher proportion of right ventricular HF than other aetiologies.29 Outcomes were also influenced by aetiology, and ChCM had the lowest proportion of hospital discharge and the highest proportion of cardiac transplant when compared with other aetiologies, mainly in Latin American countries. So, the poorer prognosis of ChCM in comparison with other common causes of cardiomyopathy is also applicable to vulnerable ADHF, related to the severity of presentation and other issues, including socioeconomic factors.

Typically, the clinical profile of ChCM includes younger people, more often women, with lower prevalence of hypertension, diabetes and renal impairment, compared with non-ChCM patients. In contrast, health-related quality of life was worse and the prevalence of stroke and pacemaker implantation were higher in ChCM compared with non-ChCM aetiologies. Despite these differences, the rates of cardiovascular death, HF hospitalisation and all-cause mortality were higher in patients with Chagas disease than other non-ischaemic and ischaemic patients.9

Main Pathophysiologic Pathways

Chagas disease may be diagnosed in the infected patient in either acute or chronic clinical presentation. In some cases, the acute phase is light and can go undiagnosed by the patient and the medical team.

Acute Chagas disease is an immunological reaction typically characterised by diffuse lymphadenopathy, hepatomegaly and splenomegaly. In this period the myocardium and the gastrointestinal system are severely infected by the parasite and show important tissue inflammation.30 Sometimes, acute myocarditis may be diagnosed with signs of cardiac dilatation and pericardial effusion. The most severe presentations may produce pancarditis and even vasculitis. In these cases, development of acute HF is frequent and the prognosis is usually poor because multiorgan involvement may occur.31,32

Development of HF linked to Chagas disease most commonly presents chronically. The typical dilated cardiomyopathy observed in most patients with chronic HF related to Chagas disease consists of chronic myocarditis producing fibrosis with particular invasion of His bundle branches, causing different types and grades of cardiac block and progressive dysfunction.33 The exact mechanism whereby parasitism causes tissue damage in the chronic phase is not clear and could be related to chronic immune reactions. The severity and extension of the inflammation and fibrosis depend on many factors, mainly the aggressiveness of the parasite, the immunologic reaction of the patient and the concomitant cardiovascular risk factors.34–36 Some patients with ChHD may also have digestive disturbances, often dysfunctions in the oesophagus and bowel as a result of inmunoinflammatory reactions in these organs, which ends in megaoesophagus, megacolon and/or megarectum.37

An Update on Diagnosis

In the acute phase of Chagas disease, the diagnosis might be suspected, taking account of the different transmission forms and patient history. Most patients are oligosymptomatic with non-specific symptoms of weakness, fever and malaise. Patients could present with the pathognomonic chagoma or unilateral eyelid swelling, which is often treated as viral conjunctivitis. In some cases – mainly in immunocompromised patients or in those who were infected with T cruzi through oral transmission – fulminant disease is present with acute myocarditis, pericardial effusion or meningoencephalitis.38–40

After the acute phase of infection, most patients develop the chronic form. This is defined by positive serology and slow progression or even absence, during a non-specific period of time, of physical signs or symptoms of cardiac electrogenic conduction abnormalities, myocardial contractile dysfunction, arrhythmias thromboembolism, colon, rectum or oesophagus abnormalities.41–46 ChCM is the most important clinical manifestation of Chagas disease, resulting in the majority of Chagas disease morbidity and mortality.39,41,47,48

ECG and Holter monitor

The ECG and Holter monitor may show tachycardia (out of proportion to fever), different degrees of atrioventricular (AV) block, QT prolongation, low voltage and repolarisation abnormalities in the acute phase of the disease.

Later in the disease progression, the ECG plays an important role in diagnosis and prognosis of ChCM. It could be normal, with slight abnormalities, premature ventricular beats, ventricular tachycardia, AF or flutter, complete AV block, anterior and inferior fibrosis, complete right bundle branch block alone or in combination with left anterior fascicular block, with or without different degrees of AV block.49


X-ray is useful in assessment and follow-up of Chagas disease. Enlargement of all four cardiac chambers with or without signs of pulmonary congestion suggests ChCM.41 X-ray is also useful in the diagnosis of megacolon and megaoesophagus, which can be corroborated with endoscopy.


In the acute phase of Chagas disease, parasitaemia can be observed with a microscopic blood examination.49 Microhaematocrit is a widely used method of identifying congenital infection. The trypomastigotes present in the blood can be seen during the first 8–12 weeks and, after that, parasitaemia falls below detectable levels.50

Serology and C-reactive Protein

Indirect immunofluorescence, haemagglutination, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays are commonly used in screening for Chagas disease.51–53 The WHO recommends diagnosing Chagas disease with two conventional laboratory tests and doing a third test in cases of discordance. C-reactive protein testing is the most sensitive test in acute infection or reactivation in patients with Chagas disease who are organ recipients or are otherwise immunocompromised.54–56


Echocardiography may find segmental wall motion abnormalities, including akinesia, hypokinesia or dyskinesia with preserved septal contraction, left ventricular aneurysm (most common in apex), left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, dilated cardiomyopathy involving both ventricles, and mural thrombus, mitral and tricuspid regurgitation.

Assessment of myocardial strain through speckle tracking could help to detect myocardial damage in early periods of the disease, and some authors describe decreased global radial strain during the indeterminate stage, even in patients with a normal ECG and common echocardiogram.57–59 Left ventricular global dysfunction with low ejection fraction is one of the most important predictors of death in ChCM.57,59–61

Multigated Radionuclide Ventriculography

Multigated radionuclide ventriculography can be particularly helpful for the assessment of biventricular systolic function in patients with poor echocardiographic windows and a contraindication to cardiac MRI. It is an excellent method for providing LVF information in patients with Chagas disease.62,63 It can also provide us with quantification of right ventricular function – although this is less precise – and with echocardiographic analysis can be used to qualitatively assess ventricular dyssynchrony.64–66 These data could all be improved with myocardial perfusion assessment.67


PET is not included as a routine investigation in Chagas disease but perfusion defects and areas of fibrosis can be detected with PET in early stages and they correlate with ventricular wall motility abnormalities in the absence of coronary artery lesions.68,69

The presence of chest pain – mostly non-typical angina pectoris – in patients with Chagas disease could be attributable to microvascular perfusion abnormalities.69,70

Cardiac MRI

Cardiac MRI with or without gadolinium is useful to obtain more precise information about left ventricular ejection fraction and right ventricular ejection fraction, thrombus and fibrosis, giving us a good diagnostic and prognostic base.17,71–74

Cardiac Catheterisation

Although most patients with Chagas disease have normal epicardial coronary arteries, cardiac catheterisation is necessary to rule out epicardial coronary artery disease, which could coexist with Chagas disease, even in patients without angina pectoris or with non-characteristic chest pain.

Ventriculography allows the detection small aneurysms, which would not be detected with echocardiography, and left ventricular wall motion abnormalities. Right and left cardiac catheterisation is also indicated in patients with advanced HF to assess and more effectively tailor therapy and determine the feasibility of cardiac transplantation or the implant of a ventricular assist device.

In addition, continuous ambulatory pulmonary pressure monitoring could reduce decompensation episodes and reduce the number of hospitalisations in patients with HF.75–77

Drug Heart Failure Management: Similar or Different?

This update is specifically focused on the management of HF and not on the parasite-related therapeutic issues, nor on the other organs damaged by Chagas disease.

Treatment of cardiac dysfunction should be similar in populations with and without Chagas disease, as the haemodynamics and pathophysiology are similar. Treatment approaches have been based on evidence from other forms of HF and most clinical trials confirming a survival advantage did not include Chagas disease. So, information about treatment in patients with Chagas disease and HF derives from non-randomised studies or clinical trials of HF that included only small proportion of ChCM.78 Consequently, there are few therapies with strong recommendations and most of therapies are based on evidence from small trials and expert opinions.

Recommendations of Argentinean Consensus of Chagas Disease

Open in new tab

While specific pharmacological treatment of HF is common to other aetiologies, there are some significant features in the context of HF as a result of ChCM that should be considered. Table 1 shows the main recommendations from the Argentinian consensus document on Chagas disease.79

Routinely, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blockers and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) represent the ideal combination in subjects with reduced ejection fraction, in the absence of any contraindications. In addition, digoxin, diuretics and anticoagulation are used as needed.80,81 Small trials in patients with cardiomyopathy have shown that these treatments can improve functional class, lower BNP and have a beneficial effect on neurohormones with a reduction in heart rate and decreased incidence of ventricular arrhythmias.3,82 Evidence for the role of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI) is lacking and only 7.6% of 2,552 Latin American patients with HFrEF randomised in the Prospective Comparison of ARNI with ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure (PARADIGM-HF) trial and Aliskiren Trial of Minimizing OutcomeS in Patients With HEart Failure (ATMOSPHERE) had ChCM.83 Compared with other aetiologies, patients with ChCM less frequently received beta-blockers and digitalis, but a higher proportion were treated with amiodarone, MRA and anticoagulants, with no differences in the use of ACEI.

Although several clinical trials have demonstrated the utility of adrenergic blockers in dilated cardiomyopathy different from Chagas disease in terms of reducing mortality and the number of hospitalisations, in ChCM, the presence of significant bradycardia and autonomic nervous system disorders with central and peripheral dysautonomia lead to greater precautions for routine use. The most used drug in this condition is carvedilol. Three trials evaluating carvedilol in ChCM were identified, with a total of 108 participants.84 A lower proportion of all-cause mortality was found in the carvedilol groups compared with the placebo groups (RR 0.69; 95% CI [0.12–3.88]), with no difference in hospital readmissions. However, the authors found that the available evidence was low quality and there were no conclusive data to support or reject the use of carvedilol.

Diuretics should be used at the lowest possible dosage to obtain a negative balance, thus avoiding electrolyte and metabolic disorders caused by high dosages. Furosemide has the strongest diuretic effect and electrolytes should be checked frequently because excessive depletion can generate malignant arrhythmia.

Patients with severe HF as a result of heart disease not related to Chagas disease have shown improvement in quality of life and fewer hospitalisations when treated with digoxin, compared with placebo. However, ChCM has been associated with changes in automaticity and conduction related to malignant ventricular arrhythmia, and dysautonomia favours the appearance of bradycardic rhythms. Consequently, as digoxin can aggravate these disorders of rhythm and conduction, it has a restricted use in Chagas disease. Low-dose amiodarone has been associated with reduced HF mortality and sudden death in an Argentinian study that included patients with ChCM. A such, amiodarone can be safely used in the presence of arrhythmias. Anticoagulation in ChCM shares its common indication with other aetiologies, including permanent or paroxysmal episodes of AF, a previous thromboembolic event, the presence of a cardiac thrombus and apical aneurysms. A subanalysis of the Systolic Heart failure treatment with the If inhibitor ivabradine Trial (SHIFT) reported that ivabradine was effective in reducing heart rate in ChCM and improving functional class, suggesting that ivabradine may have a favourable benefit-risk profile in this population.85 Specific drugs to eliminate the parasite or its reactions and non-pharmacological or invasive therapies are explained in the following section.

Specific Antitrypanosomal Therapy

Treatment for Chagas disease is mainly non-invasive in the early stages, when nifurtimox or benznidazole are used. More invasive procedures could be applied in advanced stages of the pathology, for example, where there is pericardial effusion, cardiac tamponade, arrhythmia and HF.

Benznidazole is a nitroimidazole with antiparasitic effects. The side-effects include rash, numbness, fever, muscle pain, anorexia and weight loss, nausea, vomiting and insomnia, plus a rare but important symptom, bone marrow suppression, which can lead to low blood cell levels.

Nifurtimox forms a nitro-anion radical metabolite that reacts with parasite nucleic acids causing significant DNA breakdown. It is used as a second specific treatment option in early Chagas disease because it has more serious side-effects than benznidazole, including anorexia, weight loss, nausea, vomiting, headache, dizziness, amnesia, rash, depression, anxiety, confusion, fever, sore throat, chills, seizures, impotence, tremors, muscle weakness and numbness.

Invasive Treatment of Gastrointestinal Chagas Disease

Invasive procedures to treat megacolon and megaoesophagus may be necessary. Megacolon can be treated with the Duhamel procedure or a modified version of the procedure, introduced by Haddad.86–88 Laparoscopic procedures could also be applied. Megaoesophagus can be treated with wide oesophago-cardiomyectomy on the anterior oesophagogastric junction, combined with an antireflux valvuloplasty procedure or oesophagogastroplasty through the oesophageal bed.89 These procedures could be extremely useful when advanced stages of HF are present and it is necessary to offer more invasive procedures.

Invasive Treatment of Cardiovascular Chagas Disease

Cardiac manifestations of Chagas disease may also need invasive surgical procedures to preserve the patient’s life or improve their functional class. Clinical management of patients with chronic Chagas disease requires proper clinical risk stratification and the identification of patients at high risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Recognising high-risk patients who require specific therapies – especially invasive procedures such as the implantation of pacemakers, automatic ICDs, ablative procedures and even cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) – is a major challenge in clinical practice.90


Electrophysiological abnormalities of sinus node, AV node and His-Purkinje conduction can be detected in about one-third of patients with Chagas disease and pacemakers have shown utility in patients with this manifestation, but in some places this is still an unmet need.91–93 AV block and symptomatic sinus sick syndrome are the main indications for pacemaker implantation in these patients, preferably electrode implantation in the mid-septal of the right ventricle to the apical site.94

Automatic ICDs

Malignant ventricular arrhythmia and SCD are more frequent in patients with Chagas disease.91,95,96 Automatic ICDs may be used in the treatment of severe arrhythmias with high risk of SCD.97 Primary or secondary prevention should be a routine indication for patients with Chagas disease with malignant arrhythmias.98 The combination of ablation procedures, amiodarone and/or beta-blockers might be considered in special cases to reduce the number of automatic ICD therapies, as in other types of cardiomyopathy.99

Ablation Therapy

Ablation ventricular tachycardia therapy should be considered after oral medication failure.100 CRT could be used in the treatment of patients with severe HF and left bundle branch block but there is scarce evidence to support resynchronisation therapy for patients with ChCM and right bundle branch block or its combination with left anterior fascicular block, where experience is not conclusive.101,102

Ambulatory Pulmonary Pressure Monitoring

Other less invasive procedures such as ambulatory pulmonary pressure monitoring, which are useful in patients with HF, need to be tested in patients with Chagas disease HF and could probably prevent recurrent episodes of decompensation.75,77

Heart Transplant

Heart transplantation and left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) have an important place in the treatment of irreversible HF in patients with Chagas disease.

Chagas disease was initially considered a contraindication for transplantat because of the possible reactivation after transplantation and immunosuppression, but advances in immunosuppression programmes since the 1990s mean that there is now a similar survival and quality of life in HF patients with Chagas cardiomyopathy.103 Selection criteria are similar to those for general heart transplant, including pulmonary artery pressures that could be elevated in some cases as a result of chronic left ventricular failure or undiagnosed pulmonary microembolism. However, the clinician also needs to consider the presence of megaoesophagus or megacolon, which could constitute a contraindication because of the possibility of complications (perforation) with the use of antiproliferative therapy such as mycophenolic acid derivatives or mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors. The administration of prophylactic antitrypanosomal therapy is not recommended because of the higher risk of malignant neoplasms after transplant in patients who received reactivation prophylactic antitrypanosomal therapy.104 The lowest immunosuppression regimen, high suspicion of possible reactivation and early detection and introduction of medical treatment with benznidazole offer a secure treatment of Chagas disease reactivation after transplant. Lifelong T cruzi monitoring is required, mainly during increased immunosuppression therapy for transplant organ rejection.105,106

Circulatory Assist Devices

Different devices for cardiac assist could be used in patients with end-stage HF as a result of Chagas disease. These could be applied as a bridge to transplant, a bridge to recovery during the acute period or as a bridge to decision, or even as destination therapy depending on the general state of the patient and meticulous clinical evaluation of the possibility of survival and better quality of life.107–110

As in the transplant population, previous evaluation of the pulmonary pressures plus poor right ventricular function could be a contraindication for LVAD alone.

Global Action on Chagas Disease

ChHD is a preventable non-communicable disease (NCD) that mainly affects the poorest and most vulnerable populations of South America. Driven by poverty, poor access to health services and other health system weaknesses, the majority of people with this condition live in low- and middle-income countries.

The need for concerted global action to control NCDs is a high priority on the global health agenda. This is evident in the UN political declarations on the prevention and control of NCDs – the 25×25 target aims for a 25% reduction in premature mortality from NCDs by 2025 – the WHO Global NCD Action Plan, and the UN Sustainable Development Goals.111,112

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of premature mortality worldwide and with more than 80% of deaths occurring in low- and middle-income countries, leading the World Heart Federation (WHF) to launch its Roadmap Initiative in 2014 to guide and support those seeking to improve CVD control.

The WHF Roadmaps are global implementation strategies designed to help governments, employers, non-governmental organisations, health activists, academic and research institutions, healthcare providers and people affected by CVD, take action to better prevent and control CVD.113,114 The Roadmaps synthesise existing evidence on the efficacy, feasibility and cost-effectiveness of various strategies. They also identify potential barriers (roadblocks) to implementation and propose solutions to bypass them. The WHF and Inter-American Society of Cardiology Roadmap for reducing morbidity and mortality through improved prevention and control of ChHD complements existing Roadmaps on tobacco control, hypertension, secondary prevention of CVD, rheumatic heart disease, cholesterol, AF, diabetes and HF. The ChHD Roadmap is a resource to raise the profile of ChHD and provides a framework to guide and support the strengthening of national, regional and global ChHD control efforts. The process also requires a range of local expertise, including knowledge of medicine, cardiology, cultural and social contexts, prevention, health promotion, health systems, economics and government priorities.


Chagas disease – originally a South American endemic health problem – is expanding worldwide as a result of people migrating. The pathology of Chagas disease is based in an inmunoinflammatory reaction producing fibrosis and remodelling, mainly in the myocardium. In many cases these mechanisms result in a dilated cardiomyopathy with HF and reduced ejection fraction, frequent cardiac arrhythmias and different types of heart block. The diagnosis and treatment of HF as a result of Chagas disease include the usual steps for other aetiologies, plus the need for laboratory techniques for parasite-related issues. International scientific organisations are concerned about this health problem and about delivering recommendations for prevention and early diagnosis.

  1. Mendez GF, Cowie MR. The epidemiological features of heart failure in developing countries: a review of the literature. Int J Cardiol 2001;80:213–9.; PMID: 11578717.
  2. Ribeiro AL, Nunes MP, Teixeira MM and Rocha MO. Diagnosis and management of Chagas disease and cardiomyopathy. Nat Rev Cardiol 2012;9:576–89.; PMID: 22847166.
  3. Bocchi EA, Arias A, Verdejo H, et al. The reality of heart failure in Latin America. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62:949–58.; PMID: 23850910.
  4. Traina MI, Sanchez DR, Hernandez S, et al. Prevalence and impact of Chagas disease among Latin American immigrants with nonischemic cardiomyopathy in Los Angeles, California. Circ Heart Fail 2015;8:938–43.; PMID: 26206855.
  5. Bocchi EA. Heart failure in South America. Curr Cardiol Rev 2013;9:147–56.; PMID: 23597301.
  6. Stanaway JD, Roth G. The burden of Chagas disease: estimates and challenges. Glob Heart 2015;10:139–44.; PMID: 26407508.
  7. Tanowitz HB, Machado FS, Spray DC, et al. Developments in the management of Chagas cardiomyopathy. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2015;13:1393–409.; PMID: 26496376.
  8. Bern C. Chagas’ disease. N Engl J Med 2015;373:456–66.; PMID: 26222561.
  9. Shen L, Ramires F, Martinez F, et al. contemporary characteristics and outcomes in chagasic heart failure compared with other nonischemic and ischemic cardiomyopathy. Circ Heart Fail 2017;10: e004361.; PMID: 29141857.
  10. Ramires FJA, Martinez F, Gomez EA, et al. Post hoc analyses of SHIFT and PARADIGM-HF highlight the importance of chronic Chagas’ cardiomyopathy. ESC Heart Fail 2018;5: 1069–71.; PMID: 30298996.
  11. Pan American Health Organization. General Information – Chagas Disease. 2011. Available at: (accessed 4 April 2019).
  12. WHO. TDR Strategic Directions: Chagas Disease. WHO, Geneva, 2002.
  13. WHO. Control of Chagas disease : report of a WHO expert committee [meeting held in Buenos Aires from 16 to 20 October 1989]. (accessed 1st May, 2019)
  14. Jörg M, Storino R. Consensus on Chagas disease: Chagas disease in the 21st century. Consensus on an unfinished subject. Revista Argentina de Cardiologia 2002;70(Suppl 1):9–10 [in Spanish].
  15. Barbosa MP, Carmo AA, Rocha MO, Ribeiro AL. Ventricular arrhythmias in Chagas disease. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2015;48:4–10.; PMID: 25714933.
  16. Anselmi A, Moleiro F, Mendoza I. Clinical picture of Chagas disease. Differential diagnosis with dilated or congestive cardiomyopathy. Revista Latina Cardiología 1982;3:97–104 [in Spanish].
  17. Hagar JM, Rahimtoola SH. Chagas’ heart disease in the United States. N Engl J Med 1991;325:763–8.; PMID: 1870649.
  18. Mordini O, Bavio E, Beloscar J, et al. Chagas disease in Argentina. “National registry of Chagas disease of the Federación Argentina de Cardiología”. RENECH study. Revista de la Federacion Argentina de Cardiologia 2016;45:84–92 [in Spanish].
  19. Perna ER, Canella JPC, Coronel ML, Echazarreta DF. Overview of heart failure in Argentina. In: Baliga RR, Haas GJ (eds). Management of Heart Failure. 2nd ed. London: Springer-Verlag, 2015.
  20. Gimenez L, Mitelman J. Construction of a new clinical and therapeutic setting for patients in chronic chagasic period without demonstrable pathology. Revista de la Federacion Argentina de Cardiologia 2016;45:84–92 [in Spanish].
  21. Ciapponi A, Alcaraz A, Calderon M, et al. Burden of heart failure in Latin America: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) 2016;69:1051–60.; PMID: 27553287.
  22. Auger S, Caravello O, Barisani J, et al. Consensus on Chagas disease. Dilated chagasic cardiomyopathy. Revista Argentina de Cardiologia 2002;70(Suppl 1):69–87 [in Spanish].
  23. Perna ER, Barbagelata A, Grinfeld L, et al. Overview of acute decompensated heart failure in Argentina: lessons learned from 5 registries during the last decade. Am Heart J 2006;151:84–91.; PMID: 16368296.
  24. Perna ER, Coronel ML, Canella JPC, Echazarreta D. Review of heart failure in Argentina: Advances and setbacks after two decades of more than 19,000 patients. Insuficiencia Cardiaca 2015;10:2–10 [in Spanish].
  25. Doval HC. Class III antiarrhythmic agents in cardiac failure: lessons from clinical trials with a focus on the Grupo de Estudio de la Sobrevida en la Insuficiencia Cardiaca en Argentina (GESICA). Am J Cardiol 1999;84:109R–14.; PMID: 10568669.
  26. Perna ER, Nul D, Varini S. Chagas dilated cardiomyopathy: clinical characteristics and prognosis. J Card Fail 2002;8:S67.
  27. Vilas Boas LG, Bestetti RB, Otaviano AP, et al. Outcome of Chagas cardiomyopathy in comparison to ischemic cardiomyopathy. Int J Cardiol 2013;167:486–90.; PMID: 22365646.
  28. Freitas HF, Chizzola PR, Paes AT, et al. Risk stratification in a Brazilian hospital-based cohort of 1220 outpatients with heart failure: role of Chagas’ heart disease. Int J Cardiol 2005;102:239–47.; PMID: 15982491.
  29. Terhoch CB, Moreira HF, Ayub-Ferreira SM, et al. Clinical findings and prognosis of patients hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure: Analysis of the influence of Chagas etiology and ventricular function. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2018;12:e0006207.; PMID: 29432453.
  30. Molina HA, Milei J, Rimoldi MT, et al. Histopathology of the heart conducting system in experimental Chagas disease in mice. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1988;82:241–6.; PMID: 3142113.
  31. Koberle F. The causation and importance of nervous lesions in American trypanosomiasis. Bull World Health Organ 1970;42:739–43. PMID: 4988694.
  32. Andrade SG, Andrade ZA. Pathology of prolonged experimental Chagas’ disease. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 1968;10:180–7 [in Portuguese]. PMID: 4982472.
  33. Marin-Neto JA, Rassi A, Maciel BC, et al. Chagas heart disease. In: Yusuf S, Cairns JA, Camm AJ, et al. Evidence-Based Cardiology. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley Blackwell, 2010;823–41.
  34. Marin-Neto JA, Cunha-Neto E, Maciel BC, Simoes MV. Pathogenesis of chronic Chagas heart disease. Circulation 2007;115:1109–23.; PMID: 17339569.
  35. Kalil J, Cunha-Neto E. Autoimmunity in Chagas disease cardiomyopathy: Fulfilling the criteria at last? Parasitol Today 1996;12:396–9.; PMID: 15275290.
  36. Andrade ZA. Immunopathology of Chagas disease. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 1999;94(Suppl 1):71–80.; PMID: 10677693.
  37. Amorim DS, Manco JC, Gallo L Jr, Marin Neto JA. Chagas’ heart disease as an experimental model for studies of cardiac autonomic function in man. Mayo Clin Proc 1982;57:48–60. PMID: 6811806.
  38. Lattes R, Lasala MB. Chagas disease in the immunosuppressed patient. Clin Microbiol Infect 2014;20:300–9.; PMID: 24602129.
  39. Leiguarda R, Roncoroni A, Taratuto AL, et al. Acute CNS infection by Trypanosoma cruzi (Chagas’ disease) in immunosuppressed patients. Neurology 1990;40:850–1.; PMID: 2109844.
  40. Alarcon de Noya B, Diaz-Bello Z, Colmenares C, et al. Large urban outbreak of orally acquired acute Chagas disease at a school in Caracas, Venezuela. J Infect Dis 2010;201:1308–15.; PMID: 20307205.
  41. Andrade JP, Marin-Neto JA, Paola AA, et al. I Latin American guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of Chagas cardiomyopathy. Arq Bras Cardiol 2011;97:1–48. PMID: 21952638.
  42. Rocha MO, Ribeiro AL, Teixeira MM. Clinical management of chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy. Front Biosci 2003;8:e44–54.; PMID: 12456332.
  43. de Oliveira RB, Troncon LE, Dantas RO, Menghelli UG. Gastrointestinal manifestations of Chagas’ disease. Am J Gastroenterol 1998;93:884–9.; PMID: 9647012
  44. Matsuda NM, Miller SM, Evora PR. The chronic gastrointestinal manifestations of Chagas disease. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2009;64:1219–24.; PMID: 20037711.
  45. Rassi A, Rezende JM, Rassi A Jr. Advanced megaesophagus (Group III) secondary to vector-borne Chagas disease in a 20-month-old infant. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2012;45:266–8.; PMID: 22535006.
  46. Ferreira-Santos R. Megacolon and megarectum in Chagas’ disease. Proc R Soc Med 1961;54:1047–53. PMID: 13892555
  47. Marchiori E, Hochhegger B, Zanetti G. Chagas disease: an important cause of megaesophagus in Latin America. Arch Bronconeumol 2017;53:450.; PMID: 28285728.
  48. Rojas LZ, Glisic M, Pletsch-Borba L, et al. Electrocardiographic abnormalities in Chagas disease in the general population: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2018;12:e0006567.; PMID: 29897909.
  49. Feilij H, Muller L, Gonzalez Cappa SM. Direct micromethod for diagnosis of acute and congenital Chagas’ disease. J Clin Microbiol 1983;18:327–30. PMID: 6413530.
  50. Streiger ML, Bovero NM, del Valle D. Indirect immunofluorescence reaction for the diagnosis of Chagas disease. Preservation of the imprints. Medicina (B Aires) 1980;40(Suppl 1):250–1 [in Spanish]. PMID: 6779082.
  51. Mucci J, Carmona SJ, Volcovich R, et al. Next-generation ELISA diagnostic assay for Chagas Disease based on the combination of short peptidic epitopes. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2017;11:e0005972.; PMID: 28991925.
  52. Umezawa ES, Nascimento MS, Stolf AM. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with Trypanosoma cruzi excreted-secreted antigens (TESA-ELISA) for serodiagnosis of acute and chronic Chagas’ disease. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2001;39:169–76.; PMID: 11337184.
  53. Melo MF, Moreira OC, Tenorio P, et al. Usefulness of real time PCR to quantify parasite load in serum samples from chronic Chagas disease patients. Parasit Vectors 2015;8:154.; PMID: 25890282.
  54. Chin-Hong PV, Schwartz BS, Bern C, et al. Screening and treatment of Chagas disease in organ transplant recipients in the United States: recommendations from the Chagas in transplant working group. Am J Transplant 2011;11:672–80.; PMID: 21401868.
  55. Tohidpour A, Morgun AV, Boitsova EB, et al. Neuroinflammation and infection: molecular mechanisms associated with dysfunction of neurovascular unit. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2017;7:276.; PMID: 28676848.
  56. de Freitas VL, da Silva SC, Sartori AM, et al. Real-time PCR in HIV/Trypanosoma cruzi coinfection with and without Chagas disease reactivation: association with HIV viral load and CD4 level. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2011;5:e1277.; PMID: 21912712.
  57. Macedo CT, Larocca TF, Noya-Rabelo M, et al. Assessment of speckle tracking strain predictive value for myocardial fibrosis in subjects with Chagas disease. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc 2015;8:75–80.; PMID: 28785684.
  58. Barbosa MM, Costa Rocha MO, Vidigal DF, et al. Early detection of left ventricular contractility abnormalities by two-dimensional speckle tracking strain in Chagas’ disease. Echocardiography 2014;31:623–30.; PMID: 25232573.
  59. Garcia-Alvarez A, Sitges M, Regueiro A, et al. Myocardial deformation analysis in Chagas heart disease with the use of speckle tracking echocardiography. J Card Fail 2011;17:1028–34.; PMID: 22123367.
  60. Rassi A Jr, Rassi A. Predicting prognosis in patients with Chagas disease: why are the results of various studies so different? Int J Cardiol 2010;145:64–5. j.ijcard.2009.04.034; PMID: 19428129.
  61. Acquatella H. Echocardiography in Chagas heart disease. Circulation 2007;115:1124–31.; PMID: 17339570.
  62. Viotti RJ, Vigliano C, Laucella S, et al. Value of echocardiography for diagnosis and prognosis of chronic Chagas disease cardiomyopathy without heart failure. Heart 2004;90:655–60.; PMID: 15145872.
  63. Nunes MCP, Badano LP, Marin-Neto JA, et al. Multimodality imaging evaluation of Chagas disease: an expert consensus of Brazilian Cardiovascular Imaging Department (DIC) and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI). Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2018;19:459–60.; PMID: 29029074.
  64. Kuschnir E, Sgammini H, Castro R, et al. Evaluation of cardiac function by radioisotopic angiography, in patients with chronic Chagas cardiopathy. Arq Bras Cardiol 1985;45:249–56 [in Spanish]. PMID: 3835868.
  65. Marin-Neto JA, Bromberg-Marin G, Pazin-Filho A, et al. Cardiac autonomic impairment and early myocardial damage involving the right ventricle are independent phenomena in Chagas’ disease. Int J Cardiol 1998;65:261–9.; PMID: 9740483.
  66. Marin-Neto JA, Marzullo P, Sousa AC, et al. Radionuclide angiographic evidence for early predominant right ventricular involvement in patients with Chagas’ disease. Can J Cardiol 1988;4:231–6. PMID: 3136900.
  67. Nivardo Sobrino A, Jimenez-Angeles L, Bialostozky D, et al. Evaluation of the function and ventricular synchrony in patients with latency stage of Chagas’ disease. Arch Cardiol Mex 2009;79:243–8 [in Spanish]. PMID: 20191983.
  68. Peix A, Garcia R, Sanchez J, et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging and cardiac involvement in the indeterminate phase of Chagas disease. Arq Bras Cardiol 2013;100:114–7.; PMID: 23503819.
  69. Abuhid IM, Pedroso ER, Rezende NA. Scintigraphy for the detection of myocardial damage in the indeterminate form of Chagas disease. Arq Bras Cardiol 2010;95:30–4.; PMID: 20563520.
  70. Marin-Neto JA, Marzullo P, Marcassa C, et al. Myocardial perfusion abnormalities in chronic Chagas’ disease as detected by thallium-201 scintigraphy. Am J Cardiol 1992;69:780–4.; PMID: 1546653.
  71. Regueiro A, Garcia-Alvarez A, Sitges M, et al. Myocardial involvement in Chagas disease: insights from cardiac magnetic resonance. Int J Cardiol 2013;165:107–12.; PMID: 21907431.
  72. Nunes MC and Acquatella H. Prevalence of right ventricular dysfunction in Chagas disease: does this depend on the method used? Usefulness of cardiac magnetic resonance. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2017;10.; PMID: 28289021.
  73. Uellendahl M, Siqueira ME, Calado EB, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance-verified myocardial fibrosis in Chagas disease: clinical correlates and risk stratification. Arq Bras Cardiol 2016;107:460–6.; PMID: 27982271.
  74. Mello RP, Szarf G, Schvartzman PR, et al. Delayed enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging can identify the risk for ventricular tachycardia in chronic Chagas’ heart disease. Arq Bras Cardiol 2012;98:421–30.; PMID: 22460166.
  75. Abraham WT, Adamson PB, Hasan A, et al. Safety and accuracy of a wireless pulmonary artery pressure monitoring system in patients with heart failure. Am Heart J 2011;161:558–66.; PMID: 21392612.
  76. Castro PF, Concepcion R, Bourge RC, et al. A wireless pressure sensor for monitoring pulmonary artery pressure in advanced heart failure: initial experience. J Heart Lung Transplant 2007;26:85–8.; PMID: 17234522.
  77. Wolfson AM, Fong M, Grazette L, et al. Chronic heart failure management and remote haemodynamic monitoring. Heart 2018;104:1910–9.; PMID: 30121633.
  78. Bocchi EA, Bestetti RB, Scanavacca MI, et al. Chronic Chagas heart disease management: from etiology to cardiomyopathy treatment. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;70:1510–24.; PMID: 28911515.
  79. Mitelman J. Consensus statement on Chagas-Mazza disease. Revista Argentina de Cardiologia 2012;79:546–64.
  80. Nunes MCP, Beaton A, Acquatella H, et al. Chagas cardiomyopathy: an update of current clinical knowledge and management: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2018;138:e169–209.; PMID: 30354432.
  81. Andrade JP, Marin Neto JA, Paola AA, et al. I Latin American Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of Chagas’ heart disease: executive summary. Arq Bras Cardiol 2011;96:434–42.; PMID: 21789345.
  82. Chagas disease in Latin America: an epidemiological update based on 2010 estimates. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 2015;6:33–44. PMID: 25671846.
  83. Botoni FA, Poole-Wilson PA, Ribeiro AL, et al. A randomized trial of carvedilol after renin-angiotensin system inhibition in chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy. Am Heart J 2007;153:544 e1–8.; PMID: 17383291.
  84. Marti-Carvajal AJ and Kwong JS. Pharmacological interventions for treating heart failure in patients with Chagas cardiomyopathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;7:CD009077.; PMID: 27388039.
  85. Bocchi EA, Rassi S, Guimaraes GV, et al. Safety profile and efficacy of ivabradine in heart failure due to Chagas heart disease: a post hoc analysis of the SHIFT trial. ESC Heart Fail 2018;5:249–56.; PMID: 29266804.
  86. Duhamel B. New operation for congenital megacolon: retrorectal and transanal lowering of the colon, and its possible application to the treatment of various other malformations. Presse Med 1956;64:2249–50 [in French]. PMID: 13419987.
  87. Haddad J and Raia A. Complications of recto-colonic anastomosis using Swenson’s and Duhamel’s technics for the treatment of megacolon. (Comparative study). AMB Rev Assoc Med Bras 1969;15:265–70 [in Portuguese]. PMID: 5311491.
  88. Haddad J and Raia A. Treatment of acquired megacolon in adults. Considerations on Duhamel’s technic with perineal colostomy. Chirurgie 1973;99:293–8 [in French]. PMID: 4201488.
  89. Pinotti HW, Habr-Gama A, Cecconello I, et al. The surgical treatment of megaesophagus and megacolon. Dig Dis 1993;11:206–15.; PMID: 8222303.
  90. Cardinalli-Neto A, Lorga-Filho AM, Silva EF, et al. Clinical predictors of inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia during electrophysiologic study in patients with chronic Chagas’ heart disease. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc 2015;9:85–8.; PMID: 28785714.
  91. Hernandezpieretti O, Moralesrocha J, Acquatella H, et al. Pacemaker Implantation in Chronic Chagas’ Heart Disease Complicated by Adams-Stokes Syndrome. Am J Cardiol 1965;16:114–7.; PMID: 14314194.
  92. Cardoso R, Sa LB, Garcia D, et al. Quality of life determinants in a population of pacemaker patients with a high prevalence of Chagas disease. Int J Cardiol 2014;177:1137–9.; PMID: 25168101.
  93. Clark EH, Sherbuk J, Okamoto E, et al. Hyperendemic Chagas disease and the unmet need for pacemakers in the Bolivian Chaco. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2014;8:e2801.; PMID: 24901942.
  94. da Silva Junior O, Borges MC, de Melo CS, et al. Alternative sites for right ventricular pacing in Chagas disease: a comparative study of the mid-septum and inflow tract. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2014;37:1166–73.; PMID: 24588623.
  95. Stein C, Migliavaca CB, Colpani V, et al. Amiodarone for arrhythmia in patients with Chagas disease: A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2018;12:e0006742.; PMID: 30125291.
  96. Healy C, Viles-Gonzalez JF, Saenz LC, et al. Arrhythmias in chagasic cardiomyopathy. Card Electrophysiol Clin 2015;7:251–68.; PMID: 26002390.
  97. Cardinalli-Neto A, Greco OT, Bestetti RB. Automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in Chagas’ heart disease patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmias. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2006;29:467–70.; PMID: 16689840.
  98. Barros MV. New predictors of malignant ventricular arrhythmias in Chagas disease: searching for the holy grail. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2015;48:1–3.; PMID: 25860457.
  99. Bunch TJ, Anderson JL. Adjuvant antiarrhythmic therapy in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2014;14:89–100.; PMID: 24288157.
  100. Scanavacca M, Sosa E. Catheter ablation to treat sustained ventricular tachycardia in patients with Chagas cardiomyopathy and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63:1028–9. j.jacc.2013.10.078; PMID: 24345594.
  101. Atie J, Steinberg JS. A cohort study of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy. Europace 2018;20:1717–8.; PMID: 29509893.
  102. Menezes Junior ADS, Lopes CC, Cavalcante PF, Martins E. Chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy patients and resynchronization therapy: a survival analysis. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg 2018;33:82–8.; PMID: 29617506.
  103. Bestetti RB, Theodoropoulos TA. A systematic review of studies on heart transplantation for patients with end-stage Chagas’ heart disease. J Card Fail 2009;15:249–55.; PMID: 19327627.
  104. Bocchi EA, Higuchi ML, Vieira ML, et al. Higher incidence of malignant neoplasms after heart transplantation for treatment of chronic Chagas’ heart disease. J Heart Lung Transplant 1998;17:399–405. PMID: 9588585.
  105. Bacal F, Silva CP, Pires PV, et al. Transplantation for Chagas’ disease: an overview of immunosuppression and reactivation in the last two decades. Clin Transplant 2010;24:E29–34.; PMID: 20088914.
  106. Fiorelli AI, Santos RH, Oliveira JL Jr, et al. Heart transplantation in 107 cases of Chagas’ disease. Transplant Proc 2011;43:220–4.; PMID: 21335192.
  107. Schmid C, Tjan TD, Etz C, et al. First clinical experience with the Incor left ventricular assist device. J Heart Lung Transplant 2005;24:1188–94. j.healun.2004.08.024; PMID: 16143232.
  108. Persoon MC, Manintveld OC, Mollema FP, van Hellemond JJ. An unusual case of congestive heart failure in the Netherlands. JMM Case Rep 2018;5:e005142.; PMID: 29868174.
  109. Salazar LA, Schreuder CM, Eslava JA, et al. extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in dengue, malaria, and Acute Chagas disease. ASAIO J 2017;63:e71–6.; PMID: 27922884.
  110. Duraes AR, Figueira FA, Lafayette AR, et al. Use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in fulminant chagasic myocarditis as a bridge to heart transplant. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva 2015;27:397–401.; PMID: 26761479.
  111. United Nations. Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. 2015. Available at: Agenda for Sustainable Development web.pdf (accessed 5 April 2019).
  112. WHO. Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of NCDs 2013–2020. Geneva: WHO, 2019. Available at: https://www. (accessed 5 April 2019).
  113. Perel P, Avezum A, Huffman M, et al. Reducing premature cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in people with atherosclerotic vascular disease: the World Heart Federation Roadmap for Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease. Glob Heart 2015;10:99–110. j.gheart.2015.04.003; PMID: 26213297.
  114. Yusuf S, Perel P, Wood D and Narula J. Reducing Cardiovascular Disease Globally: The World Heart Federation’s Roadmaps. Glob Heart 2015;10:93–5. j.gheart.2015.05.001; PMID: 26213295.